If (People+Place) x Relationship = Space then we need to develop a synergised response to the Place and the People. This is more than simply a redevelopment exercise of a place, it is about a recognition of the interconnection of people and place. It is more about nuances rather than grand plans (although these maybe a part), so I think in terms of taking cues from the space. Taking a cue is the term taken from drama, and in Here be Dragons we explore the idea of youth work and theodrama. James picks up a connection with this theme and the hide and seek G-d HERE
Lugi suggests “Mission is a relational and improvisational process in which each actor(s) respond to the questions and personalities of the guests” I would want to push this to include the improvisation and change of the place. Like any theater space there is a certain amount of fixed space, but by responding to the questions of the space and running with cues it gives you, the physical space takes on personality. Our work at the skate park started with the cue of redeveloping the skating area, it expanded to include a shift (improvisation) in games area next door, playing with the green space around it, and providing extra lights and power to set a stage for future developments. As the space was opened up and young people and the wider audience (the community) were consulted on pathways and changes. It the end what was created, although a fixed space, has the feelings of stage, that can be interacted with and in. It provides a place from which we can look for other cues from the young people as we seek to improvise with young people and discover the hide and seek G-d.
Pingback: Interactive leadership beyond the fourth wall | Detached Youthwork – Learning from the Street